The Living Building Concept (LBC) is a construction model that treats a building not as a one-off project with a handover date, but as a product that keeps moving with its users’ needs throughout its life. The concept was developed by Prof. Hennes de Ridder of Delft University of Technology.

The heart of the idea: in normal practice a building is designed once, procured on lowest price, handed over — and then the builder leaves the stage. Everything that changes afterwards is expensive alteration. The LBC inverts that.

The four principles

  1. The building as a cost-benefit generator across its life cycle. The measure is not the construction cost but the return over the whole period of use: building, operating, maintaining, adapting and finally reusing.
  2. Process thinking instead of project thinking. The building is managed continuously. Change of use, extension and the removal of parts are anticipated events, not emergencies.
  3. Transparency between the parties. Client, contractor and user share insight into what a decision costs in the longer term. Without that insight, the cheapest option today always wins.
  4. Trust and flexibility. The supplier stays connected to the building and delivers performance, not bricks. That requires a longer relationship than a procurement with a single handover moment.

What it means in building terms

The concept is not an aesthetic movement but a set of consequences for design:

Not the same as the Living Building Challenge

The names resemble each other, but they are different things. The Living Building Challenge is an international certification programme for highly ambitious sustainable buildings, with requirements on energy, water and materials among others. The Living Building Concept by De Ridder is not about certification but about the organisation of the construction process and the adaptability of the building.

Related thinking

The LBC follows on from older ideas about adaptable building, such as John Habraken’s separation of support and infill, and connects with current thinking on circular construction and adaptive reuse. What these approaches share is the assumption that a building’s use has a shorter life than the building itself — and that the design should account for it.

Related terms

Want to know more about building terms? Take a look at our knowledge base on fredsdiyplans.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *